Wednesday 03rd February

Sandringham Rd feedback due

Where: http://engage.ubiquity.co.nz/surveys/mDKi1OONQ0e7GQjTIaAp7Q
When: 5pm

Last chance to give feedback on the options for safer bike travel along the Sandringham Rd extension. Add your voice!

You could call it bridging the path between the bridges...
You could call it bridging the path between the bridges…

The Puketatapa Local Board is proposing to add cycle facilities to Sandringham Road Extension – that’s the southernmost bit of Sandringham Road between Walmsley Park / War Memorial Park at the north end, and Stoddard Road at the south end.

At the north, you have the lovely park Greenways that Puketapapa is known for – and at the southern end, you have the Ernie Pinches walking and cycling overbridge leading across State Highway 20 to the cycleway along same motorway – which leads to Onehunga in the east, and to Owairaka and the Waterview Cycleway in the west.

A pretty important link, both for locals wanting to ride to the supermarket at the southern end or the school at the northern end, as well as for people riding longer distances.

Proposed extents of the facilities.
Proposed extents of the facilities.

But at the moment, this Sandringham Road Ext stretch is a pretty horrid and busy road (and bookended by a huge intersection with Stoddard Road) – bad enough to discourage all but the most confident riders. This needs to change to link up these two parts of the existing network.

With Auckland Transport busy with other projects (including, to be fair, one larger one in the same area of Puketapapa), the Local Board has taken up the challenge and is proposing to spend their own transport funding on fixing this link.

The four options.
The four options.

In 2015, they have reviewed various options, and they are now wanting feedback:

  • Option 1 – painted cycle lanes (with painted buffer strips) on both sides
  • Option 2 – protected cycle lanes (with some form of on-road physical buffers such as kerbed strips) on both sides
  • Option 3 – shared paths on both sides, allowing travel both ways
  • Option 4 – a painted cycle lane on the western side allowing travel northbound, and a shared path on the eastern side, allowing travel both ways

Now, the solution is easy, isn’t it? Pick Option 2 and go for gold!

Well, sadly the Local Board informs us that they are aiming for Option 4, because of the following reasons:

ReasonsIf you look at the option cost estimates they provide in the longer assessment matrix (see in the feedback link), you will see that Option 2 is actually 2 million (!) dollars more costly, apparently mainly due to the need to relocate underground services for the shift. Ouch. That’s a lot of money for a Local Board, and seems clearly outside their budget.

Sure, they could try to get a top-up from Auckland Transport. But their money is spoken for – and at our guess, even if the extra cost is agreed on, this would likely delay the project for quite a while, possibly years. In contrast, the Board says they have the ability to fund Option 4 directly.

Bike Auckland always wants the best quality for cycling. But all too often, we have to accept that the money or will isn’t there yet, and then have to choose between saying “Not worth doing in that case!” and “A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush”. We tend to choose the second option, gritting our pragmatist teeth, even if they get a bit worn at times.

How do you feel?

You can provide your feedback to the Local Board here (and also read more about the proposal). Consultation closes Wednesday 3 February 2016 at 5pm.

PS: However you feel about the options – please tell them that the big intersection with Stoddard Road can’t be excluded from the works. It’s not absolutely clear whether their option costings include works there – but leaving that out of the scope would definitely hamstring the project!

Categories
General News
Share this

5 responses to “Sandringham Road Ext – How much is too much?

  1. In the future, Sandringham Rd will get a) bus lanes and eventually b) LRT (well, it’s on AT’s wishlist). We also know that via the Unitary Plan there will likely be some medium density development there in the future.

    Assuming the road corridor will be used for a) vehicles and b) PT, why not do this right in the 1st place?

    So , let’s move the footpaths now and build parking protected Copenhagen Lanes without touching the actual road corridor.

    Then we are in a position to create best practice cycle crossings at the Stoddard Road intersection.

    1. The second option, which is cheaper and allows a good temporary fix given the potential changes ahead for the corridor, is to remove the parking from the eastern side of the road (less side roads) and build a curb protected 2 way cycle lane (Nelson St style). Add bus stop bypasses and you have a very good quality cycle lane. But that option needs political will from AT. So not likely to happen.

  2. Looking at option 4, the proposed shared path on the eastern side will cross many driveways and properties with high hedges and fences blocking sight lines to the path. People pulling out from drives don’t expect cyclist to be on the footpath this doesn’t seem like it will be a very safe path for people to cycle on. Also crossing side roads without priority isn’t very convenient or safe. It would be great to save the money however in the interest of getting a fit for purpose infrastructure perhaps it’s best if the budget isn’t available then wait until it is and go with option 2 or some variation of option 2.

  3. Thanks for promoting the consultation and for the feedback. I haven’t got the final feedback report yet, but I understand we got around 40 responses to the survey (which is really good!). The Puketapapa Local Board will be making a final decision on which option to go with on Thursday 25th February. You can join the event on Facebook here https://www.facebook.com/events/1045943435436303/ and then you’ll get notified when I put the agenda link up there so you can see the report (likely to be around Thursday or Friday next week, about a week before the decision-making). It’s a tricky one!

    1. All good Julie – thanks for pushing forward with this, even when money is tight. Every new bit of cycleway improves all the older ones at the same time!

Comments are closed.